Doccábh legal system: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*** largely this is "procedural centralization"; the court is not a forum, it is an investigation | *** largely this is "procedural centralization"; the court is not a forum, it is an investigation | ||
** focus on turning the law into something more schematic, focusing on ownership, obligation, inheritance... | ** focus on turning the law into something more schematic, focusing on ownership, obligation, inheritance... | ||
** | ** [[Caoir Ergesi]] is the "father" of this movement | ||
*** legalist philosophy... | *** legalist philosophy... | ||
*** not a "rewriting" of the law but a grammar of law | *** not a "rewriting" of the law but a grammar of law | ||
*** "rationalist" project of facts -> classification -> principle -> judgement | *** "rationalist" project of facts -> classification -> principle -> judgement | ||
*** later facts -> precedent -> interpretation -> judgement | *** later facts -> precedent -> interpretation -> judgement | ||
** interpretation of ~hadith, cases as settled by | ** interpretation of ~hadith, cases as settled by caoir being the gold standard, then direct followers of caoir... | ||
* descendant systems probably end up having common-law-aesthetics with canon-law-structure? | * descendant systems probably end up having common-law-aesthetics with canon-law-structure? | ||
** more authoritative exemplars than binding precedent | ** more authoritative exemplars than binding precedent | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*** "rationalism", reconstruct the principle of law | *** "rationalism", reconstruct the principle of law | ||
*** "traditionalism", follow authoritative rulings | *** "traditionalism", follow authoritative rulings | ||
*** "historicism", recover what | *** "historicism", recover what caoir meant | ||
*** "pragmatism", adapt inherited doctrine to current reality | *** "pragmatism", adapt inherited doctrine to current reality | ||
** thru tsc invasion and the dissolution of the empire, you lose a lot of the case law and authoritative imperial jurists | ** thru tsc invasion and the dissolution of the empire, you lose a lot of the case law and authoritative imperial jurists | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*** codified system, civil-law-shaped | *** codified system, civil-law-shaped | ||
*** jurist-school tradition based on revival of ancient law (renaissance?) | *** jurist-school tradition based on revival of ancient law (renaissance?) | ||
[[Category:Doccabh]] | |||
Revision as of 14:27, 28 September 2026
The Doccábh legal system was the set of laws, regulations, and rules used by the Doccábh Empire, spanning a jurisprudence of TODO to TODO. It forms the basis for the majority of the legal systems in Yazland.
Early Doccábh Law
Caoirism and Quinquevirate Law
Late imperial law
Legacy
Notes
This page is a draft. |
- basis in customary, kinship-based courts, then built upon fiqh-style
- prehistorical law largely looks like village elders mediating discussion?
- major reform at some point in imperial history:
- adversarial -> inquisitorial (matches an increasing amount of bureaucracy as the empire forms)
- largely this is "procedural centralization"; the court is not a forum, it is an investigation
- focus on turning the law into something more schematic, focusing on ownership, obligation, inheritance...
- Caoir Ergesi is the "father" of this movement
- legalist philosophy...
- not a "rewriting" of the law but a grammar of law
- "rationalist" project of facts -> classification -> principle -> judgement
- later facts -> precedent -> interpretation -> judgement
- interpretation of ~hadith, cases as settled by caoir being the gold standard, then direct followers of caoir...
- adversarial -> inquisitorial (matches an increasing amount of bureaucracy as the empire forms)
- descendant systems probably end up having common-law-aesthetics with canon-law-structure?
- more authoritative exemplars than binding precedent
- even within doccábh law, various ideological factions of law:
- "rationalism", reconstruct the principle of law
- "traditionalism", follow authoritative rulings
- "historicism", recover what caoir meant
- "pragmatism", adapt inherited doctrine to current reality
- thru tsc invasion and the dissolution of the empire, you lose a lot of the case law and authoritative imperial jurists
- 3 main lineages?
- precedent system, common-law-shaped
- codified system, civil-law-shaped
- jurist-school tradition based on revival of ancient law (renaissance?)